User Tools

Site Tools


2019:groups:tools:adl

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
2019:groups:tools:adl [2019/06/27 15:00]
sezen.sekmen [Quantifying overlaps between analysis search regions using ADLs]
2019:groups:tools:adl [2019/06/27 17:05]
sezen.sekmen [Quantifying overlaps between analysis search regions using ADLs]
Line 15: Line 15:
 Questions for us to answer: Questions for us to answer:
  
-  * What is the ideal physics content for an ADL?  An inclusive list discussed at the [[Fermilab ADL workshop]] is  [[https://​docs.google.com/​document/​d/​1KrSarg4_c_Ph76SI8i9_b-wBEN6V90mWNLTaZq3y85E/​edit?​usp=sharing|in this googledoc]]. You are welcome to take a look and edit.+  * What is the ideal physics content for an ADL?  An inclusive list discussed at the [[https://​indico.cern.ch/​event/​769263/​|Fermilab ADL workshop]] is  [[https://​docs.google.com/​document/​d/​1KrSarg4_c_Ph76SI8i9_b-wBEN6V90mWNLTaZq3y85E/​edit?​usp=sharing|in this googledoc]]. You are welcome to take a look and edit.
   * What is the best syntax for expressing composite particles, like Zs, tops, Higgsses, etc.?  How can we access information on the constituents?​   * What is the best syntax for expressing composite particles, like Zs, tops, Higgsses, etc.?  How can we access information on the constituents?​
   * What is the minimal list of math and HEP functions/​operators we need for describing the analysis?   * What is the minimal list of math and HEP functions/​operators we need for describing the analysis?
Line 28: Line 28:
  
 ==== Quantifying overlaps between analysis search regions using ADLs ==== ==== Quantifying overlaps between analysis search regions using ADLs ====
 +
 +Members: Sezen, Wolfgang (, Harrison)
 +
 +Find and visualize overlaps in a model-independent way, without generating events. ​ Directly sample the event selection. ​ Useful for analysis design phase, or quick comparisons within experiments (e.g. Run2 CMS SUSY pMSSM combination)
  
   * Start from the analysis description,​ which lists objects and event selections.  ​   * Start from the analysis description,​ which lists objects and event selections.  ​
-  * Construct a feature space from all mathematically orthogonal variables (e.g. MET, jet1.pt, jet2.pt, electron1.eta,​ ...).   +  * Construct a feature space from all mathematically orthogonal ​"​basic" ​variables (e.g. MET, jet1.pt, jet2.pt, electron1.eta,​ ...).   
-  * Randomly sample the feature space for each analysis. +  * Randomly sample the feature space for each analysis ​based on cuts on the feature space components (jet1.pt > 100, MET > 299, etc.)
-  * Use the sampled points to obtain ​values for higher order variablessuch as HT, MT, etc. +  * Use the sampled points to compute ​values for "​composite" ​variables such as HT(jets), dphi(jets), MT(lepton, MET), etc. 
-  * Compare feature spaces between analyses, find overlaps+  * Compare feature spaces between analyses, find and visualize ​overlaps ​and exclusions. 
 +  * As a very simple first step, we simply check if two analyses are disjoint in any of the basic variables.
  
 ==== ADLs for recasting ==== ==== ADLs for recasting ====
2019/groups/tools/adl.txt · Last modified: 2020/01/14 18:01 by sezen.sekmen