This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
2019:groups:tools:searchmeas [2019/06/25 10:32] jonathan.butterworth |
2019:groups:tools:searchmeas [2019/06/25 11:03] jonathan.butterworth |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Search/measurement compatibility and complementarity ====== | ====== Search/measurement compatibility and complementarity ====== | ||
- | //Members: Andy B, Ben F, **Jon B**, David Y, Anders K, Kar, D, Sanmay Ganguly, M. van Beekveld, Are R., Juhi Dutta, Tomas G, Priscilla P // | + | //Members: Andy B, Ben F, **Jon B**, David Y, Anders K, Kar, D, Sanmay Ganguly, M. van Beekveld, Are R., Juhi Dutta, Tomas G, Priscilla P, Tomas G. // |
General idea is to look at how the sensitivity of measurements compares to that of searches. Are they compatible where they overlap? Are there regions of complementarity? | General idea is to look at how the sensitivity of measurements compares to that of searches. Are they compatible where they overlap? Are there regions of complementarity? | ||
- | === Contur tutorial / hacking into on Sat morning === | + | * Contur: [[https://contur.hepforge.org/|Contur hepforge pages]]; {{ :2019:groups:tools:contur.pptx | Slides from Sat morning}} |
- | + | ||
- | * [[https://contur.hepforge.org/|Contur hepforge pages]] | + | |
- | * Slides: {{ :2019:groups:tools:contur.pptx |}} | + | |
=== Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point === | === Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point === | ||
- | Anders and Tomasz supplied SLHA files below. | + | Anders and Tomas supplied SLHA files below. |
=== Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino === | === Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino === | ||
Line 18: | Line 15: | ||
The hepmc data available (M. van Beekveld) see below. | The hepmc data available (M. van Beekveld) see below. | ||
- | === Four tops === | + | === Four Top Complimentarity === |
- | (Ben F to supply SLHA+UFO) | + | Deepak, David... |
+ | 2HDM+a: | ||
+ | * UFO MOdel + example Herwig runcard {{http://www.hep.ucl.ac.uk/~yallup/2hdm.tar.gz}} | ||
+ | * Benchmark ATLAS for 4 top comparison, fig 19b {{https://arxiv.org/pdf/1903.01400.pdf}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | (Ben F to supply SLHA+UFO?) | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Using rivet searches in Contur === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Try an existing one e.g. MET+JET search? Louie... | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Full Run II dileptons === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Andy, Louie, Tanya ... can we write a rivet routine for this and use it in contur? | ||
+ | Good model to try this on is the Third Family Hypercharge Model studied in [[https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.10954|1904.10954]] {{ :2019:groups:tools:zprime_tfhm.tar.gz | (UFO files)}} | ||
+ | === 2HDM+Pseudoscalar comarisons === | ||
+ | Jon, Priscilla. | ||
+ | Preliminary study with Contur [[https://contur.hepforge.org/results/Pseudoscalar_2HDM/index.html|here]] | ||
+ | This is the model also being considered from the four top point of view (see above). | ||
=== GAMBIT SLHA files === | === GAMBIT SLHA files === | ||
Line 44: | Line 60: | ||
=== mbeekveld SLHA files === | === mbeekveld SLHA files === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note that more is available upon request | ||
+ | |||
Compressed higgsinos: | Compressed higgsinos: | ||
* n1 = 373 GeV, c1 = 375 GeV, n2 = 380 GeV, rest above 500 GeV | * n1 = 373 GeV, c1 = 375 GeV, n2 = 380 GeV, rest above 500 GeV | ||
Line 67: | Line 86: | ||
- | ==Four Top Complimentarity== | ||
- | 2HDM+a: | ||
- | * UFO MOdel + example Herwig runcard {{http://www.hep.ucl.ac.uk/~yallup/2hdm.tar.gz}} | ||
- | * Benchmark ATLAS for 4 top comparison, fig 19b {{https://arxiv.org/pdf/1903.01400.pdf}} | ||