This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
2019:groups:tools:searchmeas [2019/06/25 10:33] melissa.van_beekveld |
2019:groups:tools:searchmeas [2019/06/25 10:45] jonathan.butterworth |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Search/measurement compatibility and complementarity ====== | ====== Search/measurement compatibility and complementarity ====== | ||
- | //Members: Andy B, Ben F, **Jon B**, David Y, Anders K, Kar, D, Sanmay Ganguly, M. van Beekveld, Are R., Juhi Dutta, Tomas G, Priscilla P // | + | //Members: Andy B, Ben F, **Jon B**, David Y, Anders K, Kar, D, Sanmay Ganguly, M. van Beekveld, Are R., Juhi Dutta, Tomas G, Priscilla P, Tomas G. // |
General idea is to look at how the sensitivity of measurements compares to that of searches. Are they compatible where they overlap? Are there regions of complementarity? | General idea is to look at how the sensitivity of measurements compares to that of searches. Are they compatible where they overlap? Are there regions of complementarity? | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* [[https://contur.hepforge.org/|Contur hepforge pages]] | * [[https://contur.hepforge.org/|Contur hepforge pages]] | ||
- | * Slides: {{ :2019:groups:tools:contur.pptx |}} | + | * {{ :2019:groups:tools:contur.pptx | Slides }} |
=== Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point === | === Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point === | ||
- | Anders and Tomasz supplied SLHA files below. | + | Anders and Tomas supplied SLHA files below. |
=== Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino === | === Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino === | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
The hepmc data available (M. van Beekveld) see below. | The hepmc data available (M. van Beekveld) see below. | ||
- | === Four tops === | + | === Four Top Complimentarity === |
- | (Ben F to supply SLHA+UFO) | + | 2HDM+a: |
+ | * UFO MOdel + example Herwig runcard {{http://www.hep.ucl.ac.uk/~yallup/2hdm.tar.gz}} | ||
+ | * Benchmark ATLAS for 4 top comparison, fig 19b {{https://arxiv.org/pdf/1903.01400.pdf}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | (Ben F to supply SLHA+UFO?) | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Using rivet searches in Contur === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Try an existing one e.g. MET+JET search? Louie... | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Full Run II dileptons === | ||
+ | Andy, Louie, Tanya ... can we write a rivet routine for this and use it in contur? | ||
+ | Good model to try this on is the Third Family Hypercharge Model studied in [[https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.10954|1904.10954]] {{ :2019:groups:tools:zprime_tfhm.tar.gz | (UFO files)}} | ||
Line 43: | Line 56: | ||
- | === mbeekveld SLHA files ===\\ | + | === mbeekveld SLHA files === |
Note that more is available upon request | Note that more is available upon request | ||
Line 69: | Line 83: | ||
- | ==Four Top Complimentarity== | ||
- | 2HDM+a: | ||
- | * UFO MOdel + example Herwig runcard {{http://www.hep.ucl.ac.uk/~yallup/2hdm.tar.gz}} | ||
- | * Benchmark ATLAS for 4 top comparison, fig 19b {{https://arxiv.org/pdf/1903.01400.pdf}} | ||