2019:groups:tools:searchmeas
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
2019:groups:tools:searchmeas [2019/06/25 10:34] jonathan.butterworth |
2019:groups:tools:searchmeas [2019/06/25 11:10] jonathan.butterworth |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Search/measurement compatibility and complementarity ====== | ====== Search/measurement compatibility and complementarity ====== | ||
| - | //Members: Andy B, Ben F, **Jon B**, David Y, Anders K, Kar, D, Sanmay Ganguly, M. van Beekveld, Are R., Juhi Dutta, Tomas G, Priscilla P // | + | //Members: Andy B, Ben F, **Jon B**, David Y, Anders K, Kar, D, Sanmay Ganguly, M. van Beekveld, Are R., Juhi Dutta, Tomas G, Priscilla P, Tomas G. // |
| General idea is to look at how the sensitivity of measurements compares to that of searches. Are they compatible where they overlap? Are there regions of complementarity? | General idea is to look at how the sensitivity of measurements compares to that of searches. Are they compatible where they overlap? Are there regions of complementarity? | ||
| - | === Contur tutorial / hacking into on Sat morning === | + | List of topics below, followed by more information on each where available. |
| + | Feel free to make sub-pages and link from the list instead. | ||
| - | * [[https://contur.hepforge.org/|Contur hepforge pages]] | + | * Contur: [[https://contur.hepforge.org/|Contur hepforge pages]]; {{ :2019:groups:tools:contur.pptx | Slides from Sat morning}} |
| - | * Slides: {{ :2019:groups:tools:contur.pptx |}} | + | * Four Top Complimentarity |
| + | * Using rivet searches in Contur | ||
| + | * Full Run II dileptons | ||
| + | * {{ 2HDM+a | 2HDM+Pseudoscalar comarisons }} | ||
| + | * Testing complementarity on Gambit parameter points | ||
| + | * Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino scenarios | ||
| - | === Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point === | ||
| - | |||
| - | Anders and Tomasz supplied SLHA files below. | ||
| === Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino === | === Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino === | ||
| Line 19: | Line 22: | ||
| === Four Top Complimentarity === | === Four Top Complimentarity === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Deepak, David... | ||
| 2HDM+a: | 2HDM+a: | ||
| Line 27: | Line 32: | ||
| (Ben F to supply SLHA+UFO?) | (Ben F to supply SLHA+UFO?) | ||
| + | === Using rivet searches in Contur === | ||
| + | Try an existing one e.g. MET+JET search? Louie... | ||
| + | === Full Run II dileptons === | ||
| - | === GAMBIT SLHA files === | + | Andy, Louie, Tanya ... can we write a rivet routine for this and use it in contur? |
| + | Good model to try this on is the Third Family Hypercharge Model studied in [[https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.10954|1904.10954]] {{ :2019:groups:tools:zprime_tfhm.tar.gz | (UFO files)}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | === 2HDM+Pseudoscalar comparisons === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Jon, Priscilla. | ||
| + | Preliminary study with Contur [[https://contur.hepforge.org/results/Pseudoscalar_2HDM/index.html|here]] | ||
| + | This is the model also being considered from the four top point of view (see above). | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anders and Tomas supplied SLHA files below. | ||
| * Example electroweakino points with large mass splittings | * Example electroweakino points with large mass splittings | ||
| Line 48: | Line 67: | ||
| - | === mbeekveld SLHA files ===\\ | + | === mbeekveld SLHA files === |
| Note that more is available upon request | Note that more is available upon request | ||
2019/groups/tools/searchmeas.txt · Last modified: 2019/07/27 15:27 by jonathan.butterworth
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: Public Domain
