This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
2019:groups:tools:searchmeas [2019/06/25 10:39] jonathan.butterworth |
2019:groups:tools:searchmeas [2019/06/25 11:11] jonathan.butterworth |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
General idea is to look at how the sensitivity of measurements compares to that of searches. Are they compatible where they overlap? Are there regions of complementarity? | General idea is to look at how the sensitivity of measurements compares to that of searches. Are they compatible where they overlap? Are there regions of complementarity? | ||
- | === Contur tutorial / hacking into on Sat morning === | + | List of topics below, followed by more information on each where available. |
+ | Feel free to make sub-pages and link from the list instead. | ||
- | * [[https://contur.hepforge.org/|Contur hepforge pages]] | + | * Contur: [[https://contur.hepforge.org/|Contur hepforge pages]]; {{ :2019:groups:tools:contur.pptx | Slides from Sat morning}} |
- | * Slides: {{ :2019:groups:tools:contur.pptx |}} | + | * Four Top Complimentarity |
+ | * Using rivet searches in Contur | ||
+ | * Full Run II dileptons | ||
+ | * 2HDM+Pseudoscalar comarisons | ||
+ | * Testing complementarity on Gambit parameter points | ||
+ | * Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino scenarios | ||
- | === Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point === | ||
- | |||
- | Anders and Tomas supplied SLHA files below. | ||
=== Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino === | === Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino === | ||
Line 19: | Line 22: | ||
=== Four Top Complimentarity === | === Four Top Complimentarity === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Deepak, David... | ||
2HDM+a: | 2HDM+a: | ||
Line 27: | Line 32: | ||
(Ben F to supply SLHA+UFO?) | (Ben F to supply SLHA+UFO?) | ||
+ | === Using rivet searches in Contur === | ||
+ | Try an existing one e.g. MET+JET search? Louie... | ||
+ | === Full Run II dileptons === | ||
- | === GAMBIT SLHA files === | + | Andy, Louie, Tanya ... can we write a rivet routine for this and use it in contur? |
+ | Good model to try this on is the Third Family Hypercharge Model studied in [[https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.10954|1904.10954]] {{ :2019:groups:tools:zprime_tfhm.tar.gz | (UFO files)}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | === 2HDM+Pseudoscalar comparisons === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Jon, Priscilla. | ||
+ | Preliminary study with Contur [[https://contur.hepforge.org/results/Pseudoscalar_2HDM/index.html|here]] | ||
+ | This is the model also being considered from the four top point of view (see above). | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Anders and Tomas supplied SLHA files below. | ||
* Example electroweakino points with large mass splittings | * Example electroweakino points with large mass splittings |