2019:groups:tools:searchmeas
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
2019:groups:tools:searchmeas [2019/06/25 10:44] jonathan.butterworth |
2019:groups:tools:searchmeas [2019/06/25 11:05] jonathan.butterworth |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| General idea is to look at how the sensitivity of measurements compares to that of searches. Are they compatible where they overlap? Are there regions of complementarity? | General idea is to look at how the sensitivity of measurements compares to that of searches. Are they compatible where they overlap? Are there regions of complementarity? | ||
| - | === Contur tutorial / hacking into on Sat morning === | + | * Contur: [[https://contur.hepforge.org/|Contur hepforge pages]]; {{ :2019:groups:tools:contur.pptx | Slides from Sat morning}} |
| + | * Testing complementarity on Gambit parameter points | ||
| + | * | ||
| - | * [[https://contur.hepforge.org/|Contur hepforge pages]] | ||
| - | * Slides: {{ :2019:groups:tools:contur.pptx |}} | ||
| - | === Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point === | ||
| - | |||
| - | Anders and Tomas supplied SLHA files below. | ||
| === Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino === | === Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino === | ||
| Line 19: | Line 16: | ||
| === Four Top Complimentarity === | === Four Top Complimentarity === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Deepak, David... | ||
| 2HDM+a: | 2HDM+a: | ||
| Line 29: | Line 28: | ||
| === Using rivet searches in Contur === | === Using rivet searches in Contur === | ||
| - | Try and existing one e.g. MET+JET search? Louie... | + | Try an existing one e.g. MET+JET search? Louie... |
| === Full Run II dileptons === | === Full Run II dileptons === | ||
| - | Andy, Louie, Tanya ... can we write a rivet routine for this and use it in contur? | + | Andy, Louie, Tanya ... can we write a rivet routine for this and use it in contur? |
| - | Good model to try this on is the Third Family Hypercharge Model studied in [[https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.10954|1904.10954]] | + | Good model to try this on is the Third Family Hypercharge Model studied in [[https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.10954|1904.10954]] {{ :2019:groups:tools:zprime_tfhm.tar.gz | (UFO files)}} |
| - | === GAMBIT SLHA files === | + | === 2HDM+Pseudoscalar comarisons === |
| + | |||
| + | Jon, Priscilla. | ||
| + | Preliminary study with Contur [[https://contur.hepforge.org/results/Pseudoscalar_2HDM/index.html|here]] | ||
| + | This is the model also being considered from the four top point of view (see above). | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anders and Tomas supplied SLHA files below. | ||
| * Example electroweakino points with large mass splittings | * Example electroweakino points with large mass splittings | ||
2019/groups/tools/searchmeas.txt · Last modified: 2019/07/27 15:27 by jonathan.butterworth
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: Public Domain
