This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
2019:groups:tools:searchmeas [2019/06/25 10:49] jonathan.butterworth |
2019:groups:tools:searchmeas [2019/06/25 11:05] jonathan.butterworth |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
General idea is to look at how the sensitivity of measurements compares to that of searches. Are they compatible where they overlap? Are there regions of complementarity? | General idea is to look at how the sensitivity of measurements compares to that of searches. Are they compatible where they overlap? Are there regions of complementarity? | ||
- | === Contur tutorial / hacking into on Sat morning === | + | * Contur: [[https://contur.hepforge.org/|Contur hepforge pages]]; {{ :2019:groups:tools:contur.pptx | Slides from Sat morning}} |
+ | * Testing complementarity on Gambit parameter points | ||
+ | * | ||
- | * [[https://contur.hepforge.org/|Contur hepforge pages]] | ||
- | * {{ :2019:groups:tools:contur.pptx | Slides }} | ||
- | === Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point === | ||
- | |||
- | Anders and Tomas supplied SLHA files below. | ||
=== Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino === | === Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino === | ||
Line 44: | Line 41: | ||
This is the model also being considered from the four top point of view (see above). | This is the model also being considered from the four top point of view (see above). | ||
- | === GAMBIT SLHA files === | + | === Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point === |
+ | |||
+ | Anders and Tomas supplied SLHA files below. | ||
* Example electroweakino points with large mass splittings | * Example electroweakino points with large mass splittings |