User Tools

Site Tools


2019:groups:tools:searchmeas

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
2019:groups:tools:searchmeas [2019/06/25 10:49]
jonathan.butterworth
2019:groups:tools:searchmeas [2019/06/25 11:08]
jonathan.butterworth
Line 5: Line 5:
 General idea is to look at how the sensitivity of measurements compares to that of searches. Are they compatible where they overlap? Are there regions of complementarity?​ General idea is to look at how the sensitivity of measurements compares to that of searches. Are they compatible where they overlap? Are there regions of complementarity?​
  
-=== Contur ​tutorial ​hacking into on Sat morning ​===+   ​* ​Contur: [[https://​contur.hepforge.org/​|Contur hepforge pages]]; {{ :​2019:​groups:​tools:​contur.pptx | Slides from Sat morning}} 
 +   * Four Top Complimentarity 
 +   * Using rivet searches in Contur 
 +   * Full Run II dileptons 
 +   * 2HDM+Pseudoscalar comarisons 
 +   * Testing complementarity on Gambit parameter points  
 +   * Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino scenarios
  
-   * [[https://​contur.hepforge.org/​|Contur hepforge pages]] 
-   * {{ :​2019:​groups:​tools:​contur.pptx | Slides }} 
- 
-=== Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point === 
- 
-Anders and Tomas supplied SLHA files below. 
  
 === Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino === === Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino ===
Line 38: Line 38:
 Good model to try this on is the Third Family Hypercharge Model studied in [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1904.10954|1904.10954]] {{ :​2019:​groups:​tools:​zprime_tfhm.tar.gz | (UFO files)}} Good model to try this on is the Third Family Hypercharge Model studied in [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1904.10954|1904.10954]] {{ :​2019:​groups:​tools:​zprime_tfhm.tar.gz | (UFO files)}}
  
-=== 2HDM+Pseudoscalar ​comarisons ​===+=== 2HDM+Pseudoscalar ​comparisons ​===
  
 Jon, Priscilla. Jon, Priscilla.
Line 44: Line 44:
 This is the model also being considered from the four top point of view (see above). This is the model also being considered from the four top point of view (see above).
  
-=== GAMBIT SLHA files ===+=== Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point === 
 + 
 +Anders and Tomas supplied SLHA files below.
  
   * Example electroweakino points with large mass splittings   * Example electroweakino points with large mass splittings
2019/groups/tools/searchmeas.txt · Last modified: 2019/07/27 15:27 by jonathan.butterworth