2019:groups:tools:searchmeas
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
2019:groups:tools:searchmeas [2019/06/25 11:03] jonathan.butterworth |
2019:groups:tools:searchmeas [2019/06/25 11:18] jonathan.butterworth |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| General idea is to look at how the sensitivity of measurements compares to that of searches. Are they compatible where they overlap? Are there regions of complementarity? | General idea is to look at how the sensitivity of measurements compares to that of searches. Are they compatible where they overlap? Are there regions of complementarity? | ||
| + | |||
| + | List of topics below, followed by more information on each where available. | ||
| + | Feel free to make sub-pages and link from the list instead. | ||
| * Contur: [[https://contur.hepforge.org/|Contur hepforge pages]]; {{ :2019:groups:tools:contur.pptx | Slides from Sat morning}} | * Contur: [[https://contur.hepforge.org/|Contur hepforge pages]]; {{ :2019:groups:tools:contur.pptx | Slides from Sat morning}} | ||
| + | * Four Top Complimentarity | ||
| + | * Using rivet searches in Contur | ||
| + | * Full Run II dileptons | ||
| + | * [[2019:tools:searchmeas:2dhma|2HDM+Pseudoscalar comparisons]] | ||
| + | * [[2019:tools:searchmeas:gambit|Testing complementarity on Gambit parameter points]] | ||
| + | * Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino scenarios | ||
| - | === Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point === | ||
| - | |||
| - | Anders and Tomas supplied SLHA files below. | ||
| === Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino === | === Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino === | ||
| Line 35: | Line 41: | ||
| Good model to try this on is the Third Family Hypercharge Model studied in [[https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.10954|1904.10954]] {{ :2019:groups:tools:zprime_tfhm.tar.gz | (UFO files)}} | Good model to try this on is the Third Family Hypercharge Model studied in [[https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.10954|1904.10954]] {{ :2019:groups:tools:zprime_tfhm.tar.gz | (UFO files)}} | ||
| - | === 2HDM+Pseudoscalar comarisons === | + | === Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point === |
| - | Jon, Priscilla. | + | Anders and Tomas supplied SLHA files below. |
| - | Preliminary study with Contur [[https://contur.hepforge.org/results/Pseudoscalar_2HDM/index.html|here]] | + | |
| - | This is the model also being considered from the four top point of view (see above). | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === GAMBIT SLHA files === | + | |
| * Example electroweakino points with large mass splittings | * Example electroweakino points with large mass splittings | ||
2019/groups/tools/searchmeas.txt · Last modified: 2019/07/27 15:27 by jonathan.butterworth
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: Public Domain
