This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
2019:groups:tools:searchmeas [2019/06/25 11:10] jonathan.butterworth |
2019:groups:tools:searchmeas [2019/06/25 11:18] jonathan.butterworth |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* Using rivet searches in Contur | * Using rivet searches in Contur | ||
* Full Run II dileptons | * Full Run II dileptons | ||
- | * {{ 2HDM+a | 2HDM+Pseudoscalar comarisons }} | + | * [[2019:tools:searchmeas:2dhma|2HDM+Pseudoscalar comparisons]] |
- | * Testing complementarity on Gambit parameter points | + | * [[2019:tools:searchmeas:gambit|Testing complementarity on Gambit parameter points]] |
* Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino scenarios | * Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino scenarios | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
Andy, Louie, Tanya ... can we write a rivet routine for this and use it in contur? | Andy, Louie, Tanya ... can we write a rivet routine for this and use it in contur? | ||
Good model to try this on is the Third Family Hypercharge Model studied in [[https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.10954|1904.10954]] {{ :2019:groups:tools:zprime_tfhm.tar.gz | (UFO files)}} | Good model to try this on is the Third Family Hypercharge Model studied in [[https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.10954|1904.10954]] {{ :2019:groups:tools:zprime_tfhm.tar.gz | (UFO files)}} | ||
- | |||
- | === 2HDM+Pseudoscalar comparisons === | ||
- | |||
- | Jon, Priscilla. | ||
- | Preliminary study with Contur [[https://contur.hepforge.org/results/Pseudoscalar_2HDM/index.html|here]] | ||
- | This is the model also being considered from the four top point of view (see above). | ||
=== Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point === | === Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point === |