User Tools

Site Tools


2019:groups:tools:searchmeas

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
2019:groups:tools:searchmeas [2019/06/25 11:15]
jonathan.butterworth
2019:groups:tools:searchmeas [2019/06/25 11:18]
jonathan.butterworth
Line 13: Line 13:
    * Full Run II dileptons    * Full Run II dileptons
    * [[2019:​tools:​searchmeas:​2dhma|2HDM+Pseudoscalar comparisons]]    * [[2019:​tools:​searchmeas:​2dhma|2HDM+Pseudoscalar comparisons]]
-   * Testing complementarity on Gambit parameter points ​+   ​* ​[[2019:​tools:​searchmeas:​gambit|Testing complementarity on Gambit parameter points]]
    * Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino scenarios    * Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino scenarios
  
Line 40: Line 40:
 Andy, Louie, Tanya ... can we write a rivet routine for this and use it in contur? Andy, Louie, Tanya ... can we write a rivet routine for this and use it in contur?
 Good model to try this on is the Third Family Hypercharge Model studied in [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1904.10954|1904.10954]] {{ :​2019:​groups:​tools:​zprime_tfhm.tar.gz | (UFO files)}} Good model to try this on is the Third Family Hypercharge Model studied in [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1904.10954|1904.10954]] {{ :​2019:​groups:​tools:​zprime_tfhm.tar.gz | (UFO files)}}
- 
-=== 2HDM+Pseudoscalar comparisons === 
- 
-Jon, Priscilla. 
-Preliminary study with Contur [[https://​contur.hepforge.org/​results/​Pseudoscalar_2HDM/​index.html|here]] 
-This is the model also being considered from the four top point of view (see above). 
  
 === Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point === === Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point ===
2019/groups/tools/searchmeas.txt ยท Last modified: 2019/07/27 15:27 by jonathan.butterworth