This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
2019:tools:searchmeas:2dhma [2019/07/03 09:20] jonathan.butterworth |
2019:tools:searchmeas:2dhma [2019/07/03 09:23] jonathan.butterworth |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
({{ :2019:tools:searchmeas:combinedhybrid.pdf | pdf}}) | ({{ :2019:tools:searchmeas:combinedhybrid.pdf | pdf}}) | ||
- | Checking through the other $WW$ analyses currently being used by Contur, several have jet vetoes and background subtraction, but all have the jet vetoed applied in the fiducial phase space and in the Rivet routine; in addition the background subtractions are much smaller and generally use the SM predictions rather than data. This presumably explains the lower **apparent** sensitivity, but means the sensitivity that remains is reliable. | + | Checking through the other $WW$ analyses currently being used by Contur, several have jet vetoes and background subtraction, but all have the jet veto applied in the fiducial phase space and in the Rivet routine; in addition the background subtractions are much smaller and generally use the SM predictions rather than data. This presumably explains their lower *apparent* sensitivity, but means the sensitivity that remains is reliable. |
This is the gzipped directory with the sensitivity plots for the various pools: {{ :2019:tools:searchmeas:conturplot.tar.gz | gzipped tar file}} | This is the gzipped directory with the sensitivity plots for the various pools: {{ :2019:tools:searchmeas:conturplot.tar.gz | gzipped tar file}} | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
==Next steps== | ==Next steps== | ||
- | * Scan in $M_{DM}$ and $M_a$ (done, but do again with the b veto issues addressed somehow) | + | Scan in $M_{DM}$ and $M_a$ (done, but do again with the b veto issues above addressed) |
- | This also applies to some of the other WW analyses we are using. | + | Note that the jets+MET analysis has some (weak) sensitivity across quite a wide range... worth pursuing with higher lumi. |
+ |