This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
2019:tools:searchmeas:2dhma [2019/07/03 09:23] jonathan.butterworth |
2019:tools:searchmeas:2dhma [2019/07/03 09:24] jonathan.butterworth |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
({{ :2019:tools:searchmeas:combinedhybrid.pdf | pdf}}) | ({{ :2019:tools:searchmeas:combinedhybrid.pdf | pdf}}) | ||
- | Checking through the other $WW$ analyses currently being used by Contur, several have jet vetoes and background subtraction, but all have the jet veto applied in the fiducial phase space and in the Rivet routine; in addition the background subtractions are much smaller and generally use the SM predictions rather than data. This presumably explains their lower ***apparent*** sensitivity, but means the sensitivity that remains is reliable. | + | Checking through the other $WW$ analyses currently being used by Contur, several have jet vetoes and background subtraction, but all have the jet veto applied in the fiducial phase space and in the Rivet routine; in addition the background subtractions are much smaller and generally use the SM predictions rather than data. This presumably explains their lower //apparent// sensitivity, but means the sensitivity that remains is reliable. |
This is the gzipped directory with the sensitivity plots for the various pools: {{ :2019:tools:searchmeas:conturplot.tar.gz | gzipped tar file}} | This is the gzipped directory with the sensitivity plots for the various pools: {{ :2019:tools:searchmeas:conturplot.tar.gz | gzipped tar file}} |