User Tools

Site Tools


2019:tools:searchmeas:2dhma

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
2019:tools:searchmeas:2dhma [2019/07/03 09:31]
jonathan.butterworth
2019:tools:searchmeas:2dhma [2019/07/03 12:06]
jonathan.butterworth
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 Checking through the other $WW$ analyses currently being used by Contur, several have jet vetoes and background subtraction,​ but all have the jet veto applied in the fiducial phase space and in the Rivet routine; in addition the background subtractions are much smaller and generally use the SM predictions rather than data. This presumably explains their lower //​apparent//​ sensitivity,​ but means the sensitivity that remains is reliable. Checking through the other $WW$ analyses currently being used by Contur, several have jet vetoes and background subtraction,​ but all have the jet veto applied in the fiducial phase space and in the Rivet routine; in addition the background subtractions are much smaller and generally use the SM predictions rather than data. This presumably explains their lower //​apparent//​ sensitivity,​ but means the sensitivity that remains is reliable.
 +
 +The ATLAS $H \rightarrow WW$ is not used in Contur to date, but is actually a bit more useable than the CMS paper, since the jets are included in the fiducial definition. However, there is still a large data-driven background ​
 +subtraction,​ based upon a b-tagged control region.
  
 This is the gzipped directory with the sensitivity plots for the various pools: {{ :​2019:​tools:​searchmeas:​conturplot.tar.gz | gzipped tar file}} This is the gzipped directory with the sensitivity plots for the various pools: {{ :​2019:​tools:​searchmeas:​conturplot.tar.gz | gzipped tar file}}
2019/tools/searchmeas/2dhma.txt ยท Last modified: 2019/07/08 13:51 by jonathan.butterworth