This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
2019:tools:searchmeas:rivetsearchescontur [2019/06/27 10:05] louie.corpe |
2019:tools:searchmeas:rivetsearchescontur [2019/06/27 18:26] louie.corpe |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ===== Using rivet searches in Contur ===== | + | }===== Using rivet searches in Contur ===== |
=== MET+JET === | === MET+JET === | ||
**0-lepton + MET + nJets SUSY search (3.2/fb)**. HEPData entry: https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1458270 | **0-lepton + MET + nJets SUSY search (3.2/fb)**. HEPData entry: https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1458270 | ||
+ | |||
Has a rivet routine ! | Has a rivet routine ! | ||
https://rivet.hepforge.org/analyses/ATLAS_2016_I1458270 | https://rivet.hepforge.org/analyses/ATLAS_2016_I1458270 | ||
Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
{{ :2019:tools:searchmeas:figfigure5a.png?400 |}} | {{ :2019:tools:searchmeas:figfigure5a.png?400 |}} | ||
- | Unfortunately the rivet routine only quotes the integrated signal in those regions and is not linked to the HEPdata entry. This was fairly trivial to change by filling a Histo1D, and using the ref data from HEPData as ref. | + | Unfortunately the rivet routine only quotes the integrated signal in those regions and is not linked to the HEPdata entry. This was fairly trivial to change by filling a Histo1D, and using the ref data from HEPData as ref. The exclusion power of using this 3.2/fb search in CONTUR was tested using a Z'-mediated DM model.. |
{{ :2019:tools:searchmeas:d04-x01-y02.png?400 |}} | {{ :2019:tools:searchmeas:d04-x01-y02.png?400 |}} | ||
- | The exclusion power of using this 3.2/fb search in CONTUR was tested using a Z'-mediated DM model.Under different treatements of MC, Data errors. (No correlations yet!) | + | The sensitivity scan here is for different values of Z' and DM mass in the Z'-mediated DM model: |
- | + | ||
- | {{ :2019:tools:searchmeas:combinedhybrid_cs.png?400 |}} | + | |
- | {{ :2019:tools:searchmeas:combinedhybrid_csd.png?400 |}} | + | |
- | {{ :2019:tools:searchmeas:combinedhybrid_csdt.png?400 |}} | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | CS=chi2(All previous assume background=data, background error=0), | + | |
- | CSD=as CS but assuming background, error=data error: | + | |
- | CSTD=chi2 using theory, where available, otherwise background and error taken from measurement. | + | |
+ | {{ :2019:tools:searchmeas:combinedhybrid_integrateds02_csto.png?400 |}} | ||
And it gives a similar sensitivity to a Jet+MET measurement at the same luminosity: | And it gives a similar sensitivity to a Jet+MET measurement at the same luminosity: | ||
- | {{ :2019:tools:searchmeas:atlas_13_metjetlevels.png?200 |}} | ||
- | **Caveat: The actual search integrates over all bins in the SR and at the moment we are just picking the most significant bin.** So the fact that it's less performant is not surprising. Two options: add some dummy histograms which integrate over SRs... or wait for correlation developments which David is working on! | + | {{ :2019:tools:searchmeas:combinedhybrid_jetmetonly_csto.png?400 |} |
Th next step is that we can update to the full 36/fb version which is on HEPdata here: | Th next step is that we can update to the full 36/fb version which is on HEPdata here: | ||
Line 61: | Line 54: | ||
Idea is to fill Bootstraps for o(1000) pseudo experiments and see how events migrate. For a given Mll, sample from the resulting resolution function. | Idea is to fill Bootstraps for o(1000) pseudo experiments and see how events migrate. For a given Mll, sample from the resulting resolution function. | ||
- | Andy working on this | + | Andy working on this. |
+ | |||
+ | Themore detailed interference study has its own page [[2019:groups:tools:dilep|here]]. |