This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
2019:topics [2018/11/30 18:48] joey.huston |
2019:topics [2018/12/04 23:51] andy.buckley |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* **Loops,Multilegs,Jets ** | * **Loops,Multilegs,Jets ** | ||
- | * **PDFs** | + | * **PDFs:** |
*dealing with scale uncertainties in PDF fits | *dealing with scale uncertainties in PDF fits | ||
*benchmark studies for current generation of PDFs, e.g. top distributions | *benchmark studies for current generation of PDFs, e.g. top distributions | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*does each group have the same reaction to the tensions? | *does each group have the same reaction to the tensions? | ||
*how to get the greatest knowledge from distributions with tensions? | *how to get the greatest knowledge from distributions with tensions? | ||
+ | *dealing with NNLO grids (NNLOJET) | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Parton Showers:** | ||
+ | *LH17 showed that PS predictions agree well with each other when input parameters are synchronized; reasonable physics choices then lead to differences; can we establish the limit of what these reasonable physics choices are? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **ME+PS:** | ||
+ | *better understanding of limits of precision for ME/ME+PS calculations | ||
+ | *uncertainties in matching PS with ME | ||
+ | *better understanding of 'reasonable' scale uncertainties at NNLO | ||
+ | *precision predictions in the high pT frontier | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Progress with higher order calculations:** | ||
+ | *any benchmarking, for example DY at NNLO? | ||
+ | *improvements for evaluation of 2->2 at NNLO | ||
+ | *loopedia | ||
+ | *outlook for 2->3 NNLO | ||
+ | *3-loop, e.g. Higgs rapidity | ||
+ | *compact expressions at the amplitude level | ||
+ | *ntuples for NNLO | ||
* **Jets: Where is quark/gluon discrimination useful? How does it perform? Examples: ** | * **Jets: Where is quark/gluon discrimination useful? How does it perform? Examples: ** | ||
Line 23: | Line 42: | ||
| | ||
* **Higgs** | * **Higgs** | ||
- | *SM Issues | + | * SM Issues |
+ | * Parton shower and underlying event related systematics in Higgs measurements for signal and background (together with Loops,Multilegs,Jets) | ||
+ | * Prospect of quark/gluon jet tagging for VBF (synergy with Jets session) | ||
+ | * Predictions+uncertainty models for backgrounds to ttH production: tt+HF, ggH+HF, tt+V | ||
+ | * Background function choice for H->gamgam and H->mumu: how to evaluate the functional choice systematics | ||
+ | * STXS: | ||
+ | * Brainstorming on "STXS for Higgs decays" or something similar for decay propery measurements | ||
+ | * Updates on STXS for production | ||
+ | * Probing Higgs Width and Top Quark Yukawa Coupling from ttH and tttt | ||
+ | * Higgs pair production and self-coupling observables, top quark mass-scheme uncertainties | ||
+ | * EFT description of Higgs production | ||
*New Physics and Higgs | *New Physics and Higgs | ||
* Higgs pairs: lambda_HHH from single & double; | * Higgs pairs: lambda_HHH from single & double; | ||
Line 49: | Line 78: | ||
* **Tools&MC** | * **Tools&MC** | ||
- | *SM Implementations | + | * Global fits / recasting / scanning spaces |
- | *BSM Approaches | + | * Analysis preservation |
+ | * LLP and resonance searches | ||
+ | * Simplified likelihoods and EFT explorations | ||
+ | * Beyond EFT: unitarity, exploring the continuum between EFT→full models | ||
+ | * BSM modelling with MC | ||
+ | * Future colliders |