Les Houches

This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong.
====== Setup ======
  * LHC @ 13 TeV
  * PDF set: PDF4LHC21_40
  * [[https://github.com/jetflav|flavoured jet fastjet repos]]  (all 4 algorithms will be provided here)
  * Rivet analysis: [[https://github.com/DReichelt/LH23FlavAlgs]]

===== Input Parameters =====
  * GF   = 1.16638e-5
  * mW   = 80.351971594491
  * GW   = 2.0842988936726
  * mZ   = 91.153480619183
  * GZ   = 2.4942663787728
  * MH   = ? (for WH)
  * mb   = ? (for WH)

===== V + flavoured jet study =====
NNLO (massless) and NLO+PS studies for Z+b and Z+c production (will adopt same selections cuts and binning for both processes).

  * off-shell Z -> mu+ mu-
  * pT(Z) > 20 GeV  (for generation cuts of event sample, to be jet-algo agnostic)
  * central scale choice E_T(Z) = sqrt(m(mu+mu-)^2 + pT(mu+mu-)^2)
  * mu+ & mu- with pT(mu) > 20 GeV, |y(mu)| < 2.4 and 71 GeV < m(mu+mu-) < 111 GeV

==== Fiducial cuts, observables & binning ====
We will adapt the same analysis (selection cuts + histogram binning) as in the 8 TeV CMS measurement [[https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1499471|HEPData]], [[https://rivet.hepforge.org/analyses/CMS_2017_I1499471|Rivet]]. 
Note the additional "generation cut" ptz > 20 GeV and that we'll perform our study at 13 TeV.

===== WH (H->bb) study =====
Fixed-order NNLO predictions with and without bottom-quark masses. 
Idea: study how large the log(mb) are in different kinematic regimes and how differences in flavour tagging impact observables. 

===== Parameters of the algorithms =====
  * IFN with alpha = 2 (-> omega = 1)
  * GHS alpha = 1.0; beta  = 1.0; zcut  = 0.1; Rcut  = 0.1; omega = 2.0;
  * SDFlav with zcut = 0.1; beta = 1;
  * CMP_Omega with a = 0.1
Les Houches

User Tools

Site Tools

Page Tools
