This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
2023:topics [2023/06/03 10:23] emanuele.re_admin |
2023:topics [2023/06/22 16:06] (current) gregor.kasieczka [Session 2] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===== List of topics for 2023 ====== | ===== List of topics for 2023 ====== | ||
| //(accessible to everyone, editing rights to conveners and organizers)// | //(accessible to everyone, editing rights to conveners and organizers)// | ||
| + | --------------------------- | ||
| ==== Session 1 ==== | ==== Session 1 ==== | ||
| Line 75: | Line 76: | ||
| * starting from state-of-the-art ML-taggers, estimate how much they are correlated to the physics in the measurements of substructure we already have. Discuss good procedures to best tune MC to describe ML-taggers. Discuss good procedures to estimate uncertainties on ML-taggers, given the physics understanding of various effects (an example is scale-variations, where our constraints from data are certainly stronger than the factor 2 variations in many cases, but sometimes the opposite). | * starting from state-of-the-art ML-taggers, estimate how much they are correlated to the physics in the measurements of substructure we already have. Discuss good procedures to best tune MC to describe ML-taggers. Discuss good procedures to estimate uncertainties on ML-taggers, given the physics understanding of various effects (an example is scale-variations, where our constraints from data are certainly stronger than the factor 2 variations in many cases, but sometimes the opposite). | ||
| * take stock of how well most recent generator developments have improved description of multiple new measurements of substructure. (Followup from a previous Les Houches 2015 on q/g-tagging) | * take stock of how well most recent generator developments have improved description of multiple new measurements of substructure. (Followup from a previous Les Houches 2015 on q/g-tagging) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | **__Tools, Event Generators and Machine Learning:__** | ||
| Line 142: | Line 146: | ||
| ==== Session 2 ==== | ==== Session 2 ==== | ||
| - | .... | + | **__Higgs:__** |
| + | |||
| + | * "Precision": | ||
| + | * Trilinear and quadrilinear Higgs couplings | ||
| + | * Lepton flavour violation in the Higgs sector | ||
| + | * Constraining the CP structure of the Higgs couplings | ||
| + | * Higgs and EFT | ||
| + | * Characterizing Higgs boson production and decay | ||
| + | * "Novelties": | ||
| + | * Exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson | ||
| + | * Additional Higgs bosons (low/high mass) - uncovered parameter space | ||
| + | * Naturalness | ||
| + | * Gaps in searches for traditional models (SUSY, compositness) | ||
| + | * Searches for cosmological triggers (new Higgs bosons and v-like leptons) | ||
| + | * Unexpected signatures of naturalness | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | **__Machine Learning and Tools:__** | ||
| + | * **Reinterpretation**: Tools like Rivet, Gambit, .., ML for reinterpretation, reinterpretation of model agnostic searches | ||
| + | * **EFTs**: Fits, PDF inclusion, SMEFT progress ... | ||
| + | * **Physics & ML**: Injection of physics priors into classification and generative models; interpretable ML techniques; ML for optimal sensitivity for BSM searches and optimal observables and likelihood learning, opening the black box | ||
| + | * **Anomalies**: A unified view of different anomaly detection techniques,.pushing the boundaries of anomaly detection | ||
| - | ---- | ||
| - | ---- | + | **__Low-energy precision probes of BSM:__** |
| + | * New Electric Dipole Moment searches? | ||
| + | * Parity violation in new systems? | ||
| + | * Exotic atoms/ions to test exotic forces | ||
| + | * muonic atoms | ||
| + | * antiprotonic atoms | ||
| + | * highly charged ions | ||
| + | * Rydberg states | ||