<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.8" -->
<?xml-stylesheet href="https://phystev.cnrs.fr/wiki/lib/exe/css.php?s=feed" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel xmlns:g="http://base.google.com/ns/1.0">
        <title>Les Houches 2019:tools:searchmeas</title>
        <description></description>
        <link>https://phystev.cnrs.fr/wiki/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 04:38:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.8</generator>
        
        <item>
            <title>2019:tools:searchmeas:2dhma</title>
            <link>https://phystev.cnrs.fr/wiki/2019:tools:searchmeas:2dhma?rev=1562586691&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>2HDM+Pseudoscalar comparisons

Jon B, Priscilla P, David Y...

Preliminary study with Contur here with links to the model and to the ATLAS summary paper. (NB. This is the model also being considered from the four top point of view.)

Progress so far/things to work on:$H \rightarrow WW$$WW$$t\bar{t}$$H \rightarrow WW$$WW$$H \rightarrow WW$$p_T$$WW$$M_{DM}$$M_a$$H \rightarrow WW$$W$$Z$</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>2019:tools:searchmeas</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 13:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>2019:tools:searchmeas:fourtop</title>
            <link>https://phystev.cnrs.fr/wiki/2019:tools:searchmeas:fourtop?rev=1564144403&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>Four Top Complementarity

Deepak, David, Benj, Andy B...

Note Benjamin's paper on speculative differential 4-top impact on sgluon models: arXiv:1805.10835



2HDM+a:

 AB: plan is to look at complementarity of a pseudodata differential measurement (for various lumis) vs current searches?</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>2019:tools:searchmeas</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 14:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>2019:tools:searchmeas:gambit</title>
            <link>https://phystev.cnrs.fr/wiki/2019:tools:searchmeas:gambit?rev=1565023626&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point

Anders and Tomas supplied SLHA and HepMC files below; first Contur runs by Jon.

Summary of Contur results (Jon)

For the bino &lt; winos &lt; higgsinos ordering there is some (about 1 sigma) sensitivity in the 13 TeV four-lepton measurements. I'm a bit surprised there's no sensitivity then in the 8 TeV four-lepton line shape, but maybe th cross section just drops too much? In any case, the model is apparently r…</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>2019:tools:searchmeas</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 18:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>2019:tools:searchmeas:rivetsearchescontur</title>
            <link>https://phystev.cnrs.fr/wiki/2019:tools:searchmeas:rivetsearchescontur?rev=1561652873&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>Using rivet searches in Contur

MET+JET

0-lepton + MET + nJets SUSY search (3.2/fb). HEPData entry: &lt;https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1458270&gt;

Has a rivet routine ! 
&lt;https://rivet.hepforge.org/analyses/ATLAS_2016_I1458270&gt;

On HEPdata, tables 4-10 contain the Meff distributions which contain the SRs, with info about the Data, SM Bkg (inc uncertainties split by stat and syst). This is perfect for CONTUR !</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>2019:tools:searchmeas</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>2019:tools:searchmeas:vsglobal</title>
            <link>https://phystev.cnrs.fr/wiki/2019:tools:searchmeas:vsglobal?rev=1564336812&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>Measurements vs Global Searches

Melissa van Beekveld, Jon Butterworth, Benj Fuks, Tomas Gonzalo, Anders Kvellestad, Andy B...

Measurements typically rely on decent statistics (to allow reliable unfolding) and so focus on regions
where the SM cross section is significant, but often precisely predicted.</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>2019:tools:searchmeas</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jul 2019 20:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
