<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.8" -->
<?xml-stylesheet href="https://phystev.cnrs.fr/wiki/lib/exe/css.php?s=feed" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel xmlns:g="http://base.google.com/ns/1.0">
        <title>Les Houches 2023:groups:smhiggs:ggf-background-vbf</title>
        <description></description>
        <link>https://phystev.cnrs.fr/wiki/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 02:02:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.8</generator>
        
        <item>
            <title>2023:groups:smhiggs:ggf-background-vbf:start</title>
            <link>https://phystev.cnrs.fr/wiki/2023:groups:smhiggs:ggf-background-vbf:start?rev=1687246972&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>Gluon Fusion Background to VBF

Topic Ideas

	*  Study top mass dependence at NLO_FTapprox
	*  Compare to impact of HEJ (see slide 6)
	*  in HH, the effects were more sizeable [&lt;https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.02463.pdf]&gt;; can we understand what differs for H+2j?
	*  A possible simple prescription for Powheg: use LO ratio (exact/HTL) evaluated on Born-projected kinematics as a first approximation.$\sqrt{s} = 13.6\,\mathrm{TeV}$$M_\mathrm{H} = 125.09\,\mathrm{GeV}$$m_\mathrm{t} = 172.5\,\mathrm{GeV}$$…</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>2023:groups:smhiggs:ggf-background-vbf</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2023 09:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
