This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
2017:groups:tools:contur_for_light_scalar_particles [2017/10/01 11:27] jonathan.butterworth |
2017:groups:tools:contur_for_light_scalar_particles [2017/10/11 23:47] (current) jonathan.butterworth |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_78wzg_nso.png?200|}} $(l^+l^-)$ or $(l + E_T^{\rm miss}) + \gamma$ | {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_78wzg_nso.png?200|}} $(l^+l^-)$ or $(l + E_T^{\rm miss}) + \gamma$ | ||
| - | {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_8metg_nso.png?200|}} $E_T^{\rm miss} + \gamma$ | + | {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_8metg_nso.png?200|}} $E_T^{\rm miss} + \gamma (\gamma)$ |
| {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_78photons_nso.png?200|}} Inclusive and di-photons | {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_78photons_nso.png?200|}} Inclusive and di-photons | ||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
| Note that the sensitivity at low $M_\phi$ and $\Lambda$ is somewhat reduced, especially for the $E_T^{\rm miss} + \gamma$ channel. Presumably something to do with the angular distributions of the decay photons of the $\phi$, but to be studied... | Note that the sensitivity at low $M_\phi$ and $\Lambda$ is somewhat reduced, especially for the $E_T^{\rm miss} + \gamma$ channel. Presumably something to do with the angular distributions of the decay photons of the $\phi$, but to be studied... | ||
| + | |||
| + | There is still 95% exclusion even at the highest $\Lambda$ values studied. Would be interesting to see how far it goes. Update - not very far? Here's an 8 TeV run going to higher values. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_8extended.png?300|}}{{:2017:groups:tools:contur_8tev-cpe-extended.png?300|}} | ||