User Tools

Site Tools


2017:groups:tools:contur_for_light_scalar_particles

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
2017:groups:tools:contur_for_light_scalar_particles [2017/10/01 11:27]
jonathan.butterworth
2017:groups:tools:contur_for_light_scalar_particles [2017/10/11 23:47] (current)
jonathan.butterworth
Line 49: Line 49:
  
 {{:​2017:​groups:​tools:​cl_78wzg_nso.png?​200|}} $(l^+l^-)$ or $(l + E_T^{\rm miss}) + \gamma$ {{:​2017:​groups:​tools:​cl_78wzg_nso.png?​200|}} $(l^+l^-)$ or $(l + E_T^{\rm miss}) + \gamma$
-{{:​2017:​groups:​tools:​cl_8metg_nso.png?​200|}} $E_T^{\rm miss} + \gamma$+{{:​2017:​groups:​tools:​cl_8metg_nso.png?​200|}} $E_T^{\rm miss} + \gamma ​(\gamma)$
 {{:​2017:​groups:​tools:​cl_78photons_nso.png?​200|}} Inclusive and di-photons {{:​2017:​groups:​tools:​cl_78photons_nso.png?​200|}} Inclusive and di-photons
  
Line 79: Line 79:
  
 Note that the sensitivity at low $M_\phi$ and $\Lambda$ is somewhat reduced, especially for the $E_T^{\rm miss} + \gamma$ channel. Presumably something to do with the angular distributions of the decay photons of the $\phi$, but to be studied... Note that the sensitivity at low $M_\phi$ and $\Lambda$ is somewhat reduced, especially for the $E_T^{\rm miss} + \gamma$ channel. Presumably something to do with the angular distributions of the decay photons of the $\phi$, but to be studied...
 +
 +There is still 95% exclusion even at the highest $\Lambda$ values studied. Would be interesting to see how far it goes. Update - not very far? Here's an 8 TeV run going to higher values.
 +
 +{{:​2017:​groups:​tools:​cl_8extended.png?​300|}}{{:​2017:​groups:​tools:​contur_8tev-cpe-extended.png?​300|}}
  
  
2017/groups/tools/contur_for_light_scalar_particles.1506850070.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2017/10/01 11:27 by jonathan.butterworth