This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
2017:groups:tools:contur_for_light_scalar_particles [2017/10/01 12:10] jonathan.butterworth |
2017:groups:tools:contur_for_light_scalar_particles [2017/10/11 23:47] (current) jonathan.butterworth |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
{{:2017:groups:tools:cl_78wzg_nso.png?200|}} $(l^+l^-)$ or $(l + E_T^{\rm miss}) + \gamma$ | {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_78wzg_nso.png?200|}} $(l^+l^-)$ or $(l + E_T^{\rm miss}) + \gamma$ | ||
- | {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_8metg_nso.png?200|}} $E_T^{\rm miss} + \gamma$ | + | {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_8metg_nso.png?200|}} $E_T^{\rm miss} + \gamma (\gamma)$ |
{{:2017:groups:tools:cl_78photons_nso.png?200|}} Inclusive and di-photons | {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_78photons_nso.png?200|}} Inclusive and di-photons | ||
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
Note that the sensitivity at low $M_\phi$ and $\Lambda$ is somewhat reduced, especially for the $E_T^{\rm miss} + \gamma$ channel. Presumably something to do with the angular distributions of the decay photons of the $\phi$, but to be studied... | Note that the sensitivity at low $M_\phi$ and $\Lambda$ is somewhat reduced, especially for the $E_T^{\rm miss} + \gamma$ channel. Presumably something to do with the angular distributions of the decay photons of the $\phi$, but to be studied... | ||
- | There is still 95% exclusion even at the highest $\Lambda$ values studied. Would be interesting to see how far it goes... | + | There is still 95% exclusion even at the highest $\Lambda$ values studied. Would be interesting to see how far it goes. Update - not very far? Here's an 8 TeV run going to higher values. |
+ | |||
+ | {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_8extended.png?300|}}{{:2017:groups:tools:contur_8tev-cpe-extended.png?300|}} | ||