This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
2017:groups:tools:resonance_aware [2017/06/12 19:27] emanuele.re |
2017:groups:tools:resonance_aware [2017/06/15 14:02] (current) emanuele.re |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
**Discussion on Monday:** | **Discussion on Monday:** | ||
+ | |||
+ | overview: {{:2017:2017_06_12.pdf |slides }} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ATLAS perspective: {{:2017:leshouches_atlas_powhegwwbbnlo.pdf | slides}} | ||
technicalities (bb4l generator): | technicalities (bb4l generator): | ||
Line 36: | Line 40: | ||
* It might even be possible to use the powheg reweighting machinery to avoid having to re-run all the grids. This might depend on how far mtop is moved from the central value. T. Jezo and collaborators have tried this. Perhaps it'd be useful to perform a closure-test, but using the outermost mtop values that atlas/cms would use. | * It might even be possible to use the powheg reweighting machinery to avoid having to re-run all the grids. This might depend on how far mtop is moved from the central value. T. Jezo and collaborators have tried this. Perhaps it'd be useful to perform a closure-test, but using the outermost mtop values that atlas/cms would use. | ||
- | * this reweighting would be missing mtop dependence in R/B. There exists an experimental facility in powheg, to capture these effects via a reweighting, but it was implemented only for DY, and rarely used. Not clear it would work here. | + | * this reweighting would miss the mtop dependence in R/B. There exists an experimental facility in powheg, to capture these effects via a reweighting, but it was implemented only for DY, and rarely used. Not clear it would work here. |
[ER: to be continued] | [ER: to be continued] |