This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
2019:groups:bsm:lfv [2019/11/14 17:23] david.marzocca |
2019:groups:bsm:lfv [2019/11/28 14:54] (current) david.marzocca |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| //To do:// | //To do:// | ||
| - | * Validate our UFO against other codes (e.g. SMEFTsim) (Elena and Jordan) | + | * (Done) Validate our UFO against other codes (e.g. SMEFTsim) (Elena and Jordan) |
| * (Done) List the parameter points required to build the complete EFT dependence of the signal | * (Done) List the parameter points required to build the complete EFT dependence of the signal | ||
| - | * Clarify the required simulations (only parton level, or also showering) for the 8TeV analysis [1606.01736], which shows double-differential cross sections at the Born level (in QED). (Juhi, Natascia, David) | + | * (Done) Clarify the required simulations (only parton level, or also showering) for the 8TeV analysis [1606.01736], which shows double-differential cross sections at the Born level (in QED). (Dario, Juhi, Natascia) |
| * Fix details of the simulations (David, Juhi) | * Fix details of the simulations (David, Juhi) | ||
| * Run the simulations for the benchmark points (38 points) | * Run the simulations for the benchmark points (38 points) | ||
| + | * Construct the quadratic dependence on the EFT coefficients in all the bins. | ||
| * Build the global likelihood and derive the fit: 1) linear vs. quadratic, 2) including angular distributions vs. not including. | * Build the global likelihood and derive the fit: 1) linear vs. quadratic, 2) including angular distributions vs. not including. | ||
| * Consider 13 TeV data | * Consider 13 TeV data | ||