This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
2019:tools:searchmeas:vsglobal [2019/07/03 12:26] jonathan.butterworth created |
2019:tools:searchmeas:vsglobal [2019/07/28 20:00] (current) jonathan.butterworth |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===== Measurements vs Global Searches ===== | ===== Measurements vs Global Searches ===== | ||
| - | Melissa van Beekveld, Jon Butterworth, Tomas Gonzalo, Anders Kvellestad... | + | Melissa van Beekveld, Jon Butterworth, Benj Fuks, Tomas Gonzalo, Anders Kvellestad, Andy B... |
| Measurements typically rely on decent statistics (to allow reliable unfolding) and so focus on regions | Measurements typically rely on decent statistics (to allow reliable unfolding) and so focus on regions | ||
| - | where the SM cross section is significant, but often precisely predicted. Searches often focus on regions | + | where the SM cross section is significant, but often precisely predicted. |
| + | |||
| + | Searches often focus on regions | ||
| with small SM backgrounds. Therefore there might well be some complementarity - measurements may cover regions | with small SM backgrounds. Therefore there might well be some complementarity - measurements may cover regions | ||
| - | of model space where searches do not reach. This is what we are looking into... | + | of model space where searches do not reach. This is what we are looking into. |
| - | Samples and first tests: [[2019:tools:searchmeas:gambit|Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point]] | + | Samples and first tests: |
| + | * [[2019:tools:searchmeas:gambit|Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point]] (see [[https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.07935|1705.07935]] ) | ||
| + | * [[2019:tools.searchmeas:compressed|Compressed stop and compressed electroweakino]] (see [[https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.10706|1906.10706]]) | ||