Les Houches
2023 Session
-
- Use of wiki pages and slack. Wifi access/set-up.
- Important info about bus, lodging, facilities.
- Bulletins.
Wikis of Previous sessions
Les Houches Themes
(Lyrics and Music)
(Lyrics and Music)
This is an old revision of the document!
If you are interested in contributing please subscribe to the mailing list. You will be asked to log in with your CERN account. If you don't have a CERN account, please fill this form to create a lightweight account.
Contributions from GOSAM, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, OPENLOOPS, Recola, ...
Processes: pp -> lljj arXiv:1411.0916, table 3 (and optionally table 4) and some related cumulative histograms contributers (contact persons): Recola (denner@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de) OPENLOOPS (lindert@physik.uzh.ch) ... pp -> lvjj arXiv:1412.5157 table 3 contributers (contact persons): OPENLOOPS (lindert@physik.uzh.ch), MadGraph5_aMC@NLO?, GOSAM (nicolas.greiner@desy.de) ... pp -> ttH arXiv:1504.03446 table 3/4 for 13 TeV (or more energies) contributers (contact persons): MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (davide.pagani@uclouvain.be) OPENLOOPS (lindert@physik.uzh.ch) ...
Processes: pp -> lljj arXiv:1411.0916, table 3 and/or 4 contributers (contact persons): Recola (denner@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de) Chiesa et al. (mauro.chiesa@pv.infn.it; fulvio.piccinini@pv.infn.it) Sherpa (jennifer.thompson@durham.ac.uk) pp -> lvjj arXiv:1412.5157 table 3 contributers (contact persons): OPENLOOPS (lindert@physik.uzh.ch) Chiesa et al. (mauro.chiesa@pv.infn.it; fulvio.piccinini@pv.infn.it) Sherpa (jennifer.thompson@durham.ac.uk)
contributors (contact persons): CMS (vitaliano.ciulli@cern.ch) OPENLOOPS (lindert@physik.uzh.ch) Chiesa et al. (mauro.chiesa@pv.infn.it; fulvio.piccinini@pv.infn.it) Sherpa (jennifer.thompson@durham.ac.uk)
Parameters according to CMS paper arXiv.1505.06250, now published JHEP 10 (2015) 128
NEW! Link to the Rivet analysis file and plots:cms_2015_i1372730.tar
Selection cuts for the ratio plots:
A Rivet analysis is being prepared to provide direct comparison with data at full particle level
Plots for the ratio:
in the following kinematic ranges:
Points open for discussion/inputs:
Comparison of LO + approx EWK (M. Chiesa et al) to CMS Z/gamma ratio: V +>= 1 jetV +>= 1 jetV +>= 1 jet
as defined in the relevant papers:
Parameters etc. | lljj | lvjj | ttH |
---|---|---|---|
order of LO contribution | all | all | O(alphas2 alpha) and O(alphas alpha2) |
order of NLO corrections | O(alpha3 alphas2) | O(alpha2 alphas3) and O(alpha3 alphas2) | NLO EW O(alphas2 alpha2) and NLO QCD |
renormalisation scheme | G_mu scheme | G_mu scheme | alpha(MZ) |
complex/real masses | complex-mass scheme | complex-mass scheme | real masses |
jet algorithm | anti-kT R=0.4 | anti-kT R=0.4 | - |
partons clustered for | abs(y) < 5 | abs(y) < infinity | - |
photon/jet separation | democratic clustering+ fragmentation | fermion-photon recombination and democratic clustering | - |
MAX(E_gamma/(E_gamma+E_jet) | 0.7 | 0.5 | - |
PDFs | MSTW2008LO PDF | NNPDF2.3QED PDF | NNPDF2.3QED PDF |
factorization scale | MZ_pole | Hhat_T / 2 (scalar sum of all partonic E_T) | H_T / 2 |
renormalization scale | MZ_pole | Hhat_T / 2 (scalar sum of all partonic E_T) | H_T / 2 |
partons at LO | g,u,c,d,s,b | g,u,c,d,s,b,gamma | g,u,c,d,s,b,gamma |
partons at NLO | g,u,c,d,s | g,u,c,d,s,b | g,u,c,d,s,b,gamma |
gamma-induced contributions | none | only at LO | all and none (PDF set to zero) |
collider energy[TeV] | 13 | 13 | 13 |
alpha_s | from PDFs, 0.139395.. | from PDF, 0.118 | from PDF, 0.118 |
G_mu | 1.1663787e-5 GeV**-2 | 1.16637e-5 | from alpha |
alpha | calculated from G_mu | calculated from G_mu | 1/128.93 |
MZ_onshell | 91.1876 GeV | 91.1876 GeV | 91.188 GeV |
GZ_onshell | 2.4952 GeV | 2.4955 GeV | 0 GeV |
MZ_pole, GZ_pole | calculated | - | - |
MW_onshell | 80.385 GeV | 80.385 GeV | 80.385 GeV |
GW_onshell | 2.085 GeV | 2.0897 GeV | 0 GeV |
MW_pole, GW_pole | calculated | - | - |
complex masses | defined from pole masses | defined from on-shell masses | - |
mb | 0 GeV | 0 GeV | 0 GeV |
mt | 173.2 GeV | 173.2 | 173.3 GeV |
Gamma_t | 0 GeV | 1.339 | 0 GeV |
MH | 125 GeV | 125 GeV | 125 GeV |
Gamma_H | 0 GeV | 4.07 MeV | 0 GeV |
basic cuts | pt_j > 30 GeV | pt_j > 30 GeV | |
abs(y_j) < 4.5 | abs(eta_j) < 4.5 | ||
pt_l > 20 GeV | pt_l > 25 GeV | ||
abs(y_l) < 2.5 | abs(eta_l) < 2.5 | ||
dR_ll > 0.2 | dR_jl > 0.5 | ||
dR_jl > 0.5 | M_TW > 40 GeV | ||
66 GeV < M_ll < 116 GeV | missing_ET > 25 GeV | ||
cumulative histogram 1 | pT(j1) > 0.25,0.5,0.75,1 TeV | pT(j1) > 0.5, 1 TeV | pt(H) and pt(t) and pt(tbar) > 200 GeV |
cumulative histogram 2 | M_jj > 0.50,1,2,4 TeV | missing_ET > 0.5, 1 TeV | pt(H) and pt(t) and pt(tbar) > 400 GeV |
cumulative histogram 3 | pT(l-) > 0.25,0.5,0.75,1 TeV | pT(l) > 0.5, 1 TeV | pt(H) > 500 GeV |
cumulative histogram 4 | pT(ll) > 0.25,0.5,0.75,1 TeV | abs( y(t) ) > 2.5 | |
cumulative histogram 5 | HT > 0.50,1,1.5,2 TeV | HT > 0.5,1,2 TeV |
Alternative lljj analysis: same as above with M_ll cut replaced by the following VBF cuts: M_jj > 600 GeV; abs(y_j1-y_j2) < 4.5; y_j1 * y_j2 < 0; min(y_j1,y_j2) < y_l < max(y_j1,y_j2).