User Tools

Site Tools


Sidebar

Les Houches

2019 Session

Wikis of Previous sessions

Les Houches Themes

Help

2019:tools:searchmeas:gambit

This is an old revision of the document!


Testing complementarity on Gambit EWino best point(s) and a compressed non-excluded point

Anders and Tomas supplied SLHA and HepMC files below; first Contur runs by Jon.

Summary of Contur results (Jon)

For the bino < winos < higgsinos ordering there is some (about 1 sigma) sensitivity in the 13 TeV four-lepton measurements. I'm a bit surprised there's no sensitivity then in the 8 TeV four-lepton line shape, but maybe th cross section just drops too much? In any case, the model is apparently rule out by both the ATLAS WWW searches (two like sign leptons plus two jets) and the CMS three-lepton measurement.

Example electroweakino points with large mass splittings

bino < winos < higgsinos

Contur runs on these events
  • No correlation info, no theory info
  • Correlated experimental systematic uncertainties within a plot, no theory info
  • Correlated experimental systematic uncertainties within a plot, using theory predictions

In each case the model is apparently excluded by the 8 TeV ATLAS WWW measurement, which has a like-sign lepton pair + jets single bin fiducial cross section. This should be checked, but at first look the paper and rivet routine seem sensible. There is minor sensitivity in other plots, e.g. the ATLAS MET+jet measurement.

bino < higgsinos < winos

Contur runs on these events
  • No correlation info, no theory info
  • Correlated experimental systematic uncertainties within a plot, no theory info
  • Correlated experimental systematic uncertainties within a plot, using theory predictions
2019/tools/searchmeas/gambit.1565023307.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/08/05 18:41 by jonathan.butterworth