User Tools

Site Tools


Sidebar

2015:groups:higgs:dmhiggs:eftdm

This is an old revision of the document!


Chair: Andreas Goudelis

Members: Benjamin Fuks, Nishita Desai, Giacomo Polesello, Sanjoy Biswas, Suchita Kulkarni, Dipan Sengupta, Björn Herrmann, Daniel Schmeier, Daniele Barducci, Michele Frigerio, Aoife Bharucha, Genevieve Belanger

Ideas

  • Do existing EFT-versus-Model studies cover all interesting EFT operators? (What about t-channel, glu-glu-chi-chi)
  • Allow observed excesses in monoX studies at the LHC distinction of the underlying EFT models?

Useful references

  • A simple comparison of Monojet qqXX vs Dijet qqqq and Dilepton qqll limits on purely effective contact interactions

http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3348

  • A study of the complementarity among monojet and dilepton searches for a variety of Z' - mediated simplified models:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.0221

  • An EFT “cutting” method in order to obtain consistent constraints in EFT frameworks, that is likely to be adopted by ATLAS/CMS in their analyses:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.04701

  • A study of the complementarity among monojet and dijet searches for a variety of Z' - mediated simplified models (so no couplings to leptons assumed):

http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.05916

  • A rather inclusive summary on signatures of various EFT DM models

http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.03116

Tools

  • UFO model file for some s-channel simplified models:

https://feynrules.irmp.ucl.ac.be/wiki/DMsimp

Contributions from DM LHC forum conveners

Combination of results from mediator (dijet/dilepton...) and WIMP searches, in the context of simplified models

Presentation of results:
  • Dijet: only “certain” constraint at the LHC (if we make the DM through a mediator produced through quarks and gluons, then the mediator needs to decay into quarks and gluons). We can use gDM/gSM planes for the combination, see e.g. http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.05916
  • Do dilepton resonances need a specific theory and specific assumptions to be considered?
  • Can we build a specific mapping between existing theories (e.g. RS gravitons) and DM theories, for spin-2 mediators?
Design of searches
  • Is there any particular way of searching for mediators at the LHC that we missed?
  • Are there other general possibilities for DM-SM interaction that would produce non-MET signatures, or otherwise not be found by looking for the two-body decay of a mediator?
  • By ignoring gauge invariance and other considerations of a full theory, are any of the simplified models missing important, unavoidable details?

Benchmark models

Non-monojet signatures can be interesting due to their lower backgrounds (and the possibility of different triggering)
  • Example #1: mono-EW-boson. How to find a simplified model signal to use as a benchmark, where monojet constraints aren’t dominating? One possible lead: VVChiChi EFT operators from http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.5064 or http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.00907. The completion proceeds through loops so it has not been fully fleshed out. Is there any interest from the theoretical community to develop those models?
  • Example #2: is there any Simplified DM models predicting distinctly VBF-like signal kinematics? (vs models corresponding to, say, VVchichi EFT operators)
Any other classes of important classes of DM mediation left out by the current approaches? (E.g. Lepton portal?)

More general questions on the assumptions we usually make for WIMP DM at colliders (only two of many…ATLAS/CMS DM Forum report soon to be published will contain more):

  • what are we missing out on, if we only look for Dirac DM? Side question, why are theorists more interested in that wrt Majorana/scalar/complex scalar/vector?
  • what are the implications of the MFV assumption? Alternative way to phrase this question: how do we link better the theory of flavor and DM theories, in a way that we can respect those constraints without necessarily making the MFV assumption as a whole?

Effect of derivative couplings on dark matter collider searches

Can the monojet pT distribution differentiate among different SM-DM couplings? An enhancement of the signal for large pT occurs if the coupling is proportional to the exchanged momentum; this happens for a derivative coupling.

Simplest example:

The SM plus one singlet scalar DM, including a dim-6 operator coupling the Higgs doublet to the DM. A recent reference on this model: http://inspirehep.net/record/1341060?ln=en , see section 3.1.1, in particular eq.(3.3) for the Higgs-DM-DM coupling, if somebody is interested to generate the related pT distribution…

A preliminary study of the monojet signature in this model was performed in the master thesis by Sylvain Lacroix (2013, in French): see section 3.9 for the case without derivative coupling, and section 4.3 for the addition of the derivative operator.

2015/groups/higgs/dmhiggs/eftdm.1436176833.txt.gz · Last modified: 2015/07/06 12:00 by andreas.goudelis